TGO_Store Elm Fork Shooting Sports Tex45 Testing
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: Need CHL info

  1. #21
    I WIN! rsayloriii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    H-Town
    Posts
    7,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 00Buck View Post
    I believe that the only restrictions should be for felons and whomever is not a citizen of the US. And yes if that were to happen I would carry.
    I'll give up my gun when politicians don't lie...

    The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home.
    - James Madison

  2. #22
    Likes to Post RiverRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lockhart, TX
    Posts
    666

    Default

    Ok, I have an opinion. I have a God-given right to protect myself, reinforced in terms of firearms by the second amendment. I feel instruction should be mandatory with concealed carry and the license is proof, just as a driver's license is a minor qualification for sharing the road. The pricing of the CHL license is not in line with the service costs by the state to issue, they are doing it and making a profit for their required service to me. Open carry is and should be a right without question (short guns exactly like long guns) or interpretation by bureaucrats for a citizen over 21 and non-violent, non-lawbreaker.

    My opinion and a nickel are worth about two cents in the current environment. Vote in November.
    Cotton's Custom Leather - http://www.tex45.com

  3. #23
    I WIN! rsayloriii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    H-Town
    Posts
    7,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RiverRat View Post
    Ok, I have an opinion. I have a God-given right to protect myself, reinforced in terms of firearms by the second amendment. I feel instruction should be mandatory with concealed carry and the license is proof, just as a driver's license is a minor qualification for sharing the road. The pricing of the CHL license is not in line with the service costs by the state to issue, they are doing it and making a profit for their required service to me. Open carry is and should be a right without question (short guns exactly like long guns) or interpretation by bureaucrats for a citizen over 21 and non-violent, non-lawbreaker.

    My opinion and a nickel are worth about two cents in the current environment. Vote in November.
    I'll give up my gun when politicians don't lie...

    The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home.
    - James Madison

  4. #24
    Moderator, Preacher longtooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lufkin, Texas
    Posts
    1,830

    Default

    Couple of things in the last few posts.

    The DPS Beauroctratic (sp) red tape is a real pain. That is the reason I did not become an instructor long ago. They have really simplified it from what it was. It is still WAY to big a pain. The DPS does not get the fees for CHL any more. They used to. Now it goes in the General fund & they get their annual budget $$$s like all the rest of the state agencies. State is using CHL to cover a lot of short fall from waste in other areas. (my oppinion YMMV)

    Like any other "TAX" this one is too high also for the work done.

    When open carry is finally the law of the land I will be out of a job. That is what should be.


    After OC is the law of the land as it should be (if I live long enough to see it) I will return to only training folks who want training to carry for PD.

    I will never lobby to keep myself this job.

    Thanks Dcav for the recomendation & I am working on another one.
    LT
    Carry 24-7 or guess right.
    CHL Instructor. http:www.pdtraining.us
    Life member NRA & TSRA. Member TFC

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    West Texas
    Posts
    1,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by longtooth View Post
    Couple of things in the last few posts.

    The DPS Beauroctratic (sp) red tape is a real pain. That is the reason I did not become an instructor long ago. They have really simplified it from what it was. It is still WAY to big a pain. The DPS does not get the fees for CHL any more. They used to. Now it goes in the General fund & they get their annual budget $$$s like all the rest of the state agencies. State is using CHL to cover a lot of short fall from waste in other areas. (my oppinion YMMV)

    Like any other "TAX" this one is too high also for the work done.

    When open carry is finally the law of the land I will be out of a job. That is what should be.


    After OC is the law of the land as it should be (if I live long enough to see it) I will return to only training folks who want training to carry for PD.

    I will never lobby to keep myself this job.

    Thanks Dcav for the recomendation & I am working on another one.
    LT
    As long as people want to defend themself's, firearms, and martial arts trainers will still have a job.
    I hope you see Texas going open carry soon, like in the next year! If that happens I bet you will have a slew of people wanting training. Practice up on the gun slinging LT, people are going to need instructions.

  6. #26
    Likes to Post RiverRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lockhart, TX
    Posts
    666

    Default

    The part that is missing nowdays with the training was when we were young, military service and firearms training was mandatory for all men in US, as military service was, until the lottery in the early 1970's with the end of the mandatory draft into the military of 18 year olds. We are now two generations away from the time that every man in the US had training.

    LT, there will always be a need for advanced training.
    Last edited by RiverRat; 07-29-2010 at 11:03 AM. Reason: spelling
    Cotton's Custom Leather - http://www.tex45.com

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    West Texas
    Posts
    1,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RiverRat View Post
    The part that is missing nowdays with the training was when we were young, military service and firearms training was mandatory for all men in US, as military service was, until the lottery in the early 1970's with the end of the mandatory draft into the mililtary of 18 year olds. We are now two generations away from the time that every man in the US had training.

    LT, there will always be a need for advanced training.
    I ashamed to say I never heard of this. Im aware of other countries doing this , but didnt know we did it.
    Please post more info about this subject!

  8. #28
    Likes to Post RiverRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lockhart, TX
    Posts
    666
    Cotton's Custom Leather - http://www.tex45.com

  9. #29
    Member 00Buck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    86

    Default

    I must say though, training is necessary but it should not be required by law in order to carry.

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    West Texas
    Posts
    1,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 00Buck View Post
    I must say though, training is necessary but it should not be required by law in order to carry.
    I must say, that this would be one law I'd support 100%! It aint like all the other sorry laws we have. If we started this "say a 6 month military training" requirement , I'd be on my way today. That is if they dont think im too old or something.


    Im not talkin about the CHL here. Im talkin about riverrats post.
    The part that is missing nowdays with the training was when we were young, military service and firearms training was mandatory for all men in US, as military service was, until the lottery in the early 1970's with the end of the mandatory draft into the military of 18 year olds. We are now two generations away from the time that every man in the US had training.

    LT, there will always be a need for advanced training.
    Last edited by Mean Redneck; 07-29-2010 at 04:02 PM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts